![]() ![]() Fair to good concurrent validity between EQ-Index with FIM, SIS-ADL, SIS mobility and SIS physical scores (ρ = 0.255-0.703, P Measures of concurrent validity for EQ-Index, EQ-VAS and individual dimension of EQ-5D Fair predictive validity (ρ = -0.26 P Fair predictive validity between the pain/discomfort dimension of the EQ-5D and the following SIS subscales:.Fair predictive validity (ρ = -0.27 P ![]() Fair predictive validity (ρ = 0.25 P Measures of predictive validity for the 5 item version (EQ-5D-5L): (Chen et al, 2015 n=65 median time since stroke 19.7 months (range 0.4-94) mean age 52.8 + 11.6 years) Is additional research warranted for this tool (Y/N) Students should be exposed to tool? (Y/N)Īppropriate for use in intervention research studies? (Y/N) Students should learn to administer this tool? (Y/N) Recommendations for entry-level physical therapy education and use in research: Recommendations for use based on ambulatory status after brain injury: ![]() Recommendations based on level of care in which the assessment is taken: Recommendations for use based on acuity level of the patient: Reasonable to use, but limited study in target group / Unable to Recommend These recommendations were developed by a panel of research and clinical experts using a modified Delphi process.įor detailed information about how recommendations were made, please visit: Recommendations for use of the instrument from the Neurology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association’s Multiple Sclerosis Taskforce (MSEDGE), Parkinson’s Taskforce (PD EDGE), Spinal Cord Injury Taskforce (PD EDGE), Stroke Taskforce (StrokEDGE), Traumatic Brain Injury Taskforce (TBI EDGE), and Vestibular Taskforce (Vestibular EDGE) are listed below. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |